Felony Tweeting; Facing Prison for Tweeting - Update from Bill Windsor September 13, 2015; the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to Suppress Speech of those who expose Corruption in Montana. The State of Montana will do whatever it takes to SILENCE anti-corruption bloggers, journalists.

The Bill Windsor case is a clear violation of Human Rights, Civil Rights, Constitutional Rights, Ethics and Law. And all to chill speech, to suppress speech, to violate First Amendment rights, and to hide decades if not centuries of massive evil, dirty dealings, oppression, crime and corruption in the State of Montana done by Judges, Cops, Detectives, the Supreme Court, County Attorneys, the University of Montana and many more divisions of law and state governing bodies.

The Bill Windsor case documents massive corruption in the State of Montana like no other case and it will trickle down to massive amounts of cases in Montana where these same folks violated people's Civil and Human rights to do just as the please, without consideration of law, ethics, REAL Montana Values, and constitutional rights.

These Montana Law Enforcement, Montana Judges, Montana Cops and Detectives, and all involved in this case have done something so massively evil here. As the right to speak, the right to not be threatened to be killed, and the right to tell the TRUTH has been seriously violated.

Bill Windsor has a HUGE, Clear and Convincing Civil Rights case against the State of Montana, State of Idaho, Ravalli County Montana, Missoula County Montana, Sean Boushie, the University of Montana, Royce Engstrom personally an professionally, Jennifer Clark personally and professionally, Chris Shermer personally and professionally, Judge Jim Haynes personally and professionally, the Missoula County Attorney office, the Missoula County Police and many MANY more.

And the all did so with willful intent to maliciously harm Bill Windsor and with full knowledge of what they were doing. As these exact same people and governing bodies as well as the University of Montana did this to me Crystal Cox when I was reporting on Peter Pilkey and Michael Spreadbury exposing corruption in Hamilton Montana and reporting on the historical recall efforts in Lincoln County Montana to recall Sheriff Darrel Anderson, as well as rampant corruption in Lincoln County Montana.

All those I allege are guilty of Civil Rights Violations against Bill Windsor, did so with malicious intent. The record clearly shows they did the same thing to Michael Spreadbury, Montana Investigative Blogger and to Crystal Cox, myself.  They knew all this was happening long before Bill Windsor and deliberately violated his Civil Rights in Extreme Retaliation for him exposing their corrupt, unethical and unconstitutional actions.

There is pattern and history and I believe also RICO claims to be made against all of the above.

Bill Windsor is liberating massive victims of all kinds of corruption, violence and oppression in the State of Montana.

I, Crystal Cox, went as far as I could and to go further would have faced false imprisonment, violence to me and possibly even death as threatened to me. I lost everything I knew to be my life, as did anyone who believed in me or cared about me. The amount of people connected to this is staggering and Bill Windsor is redeeming us all with the Truth.

What happened to me with these same people changed the course of my life forever and put me under years of torture and duress and massive economic loss, family loss, friends and more as I stood against them best I could for as long as I could.

What happened to Michael Spreadbury with these SAME people and entities changed the course of his life forever and put him under massive hardship for simply doing the right thing.

Michael Spreadbury is a very good investigative reporter, a strong and smart man, an educated man, and a man of true justice.   He stood against all odds against all of these folks and they caused him massive harm year after year. They violated Michael Spreadbury's civil rights to the extreme.

Bill Windsor, a man with a big heart, smart mind, incredible follow through and focus, creative, bold, altruistic and lot's of moxy, rode in on a white horse and breathed life into something that was about to take the lives of many that he may never know, including myself.

Bill Windsor is a hero to me, he always will be.  And he is a Hero to every citizen in Montana, whether they know or not.  As a 4th generation Montanan, I wept deeply at what was happening to people, to victims of these same people for decades. And as I attempted to report their story, I was retaliated against and eventually left my home town, my state, my people to save my life from these very people.

Bill speaks for all who cannot. He is giving voice to voiceless he may never personally know. And for all those victims of rape, corruption, violence in the state of Montana, Bill Windsor has brought hope.

Those who personally know me know that I am deeply spiritual and I tell you what Bill Windsor was an answer to my prayers, and to the prayers of so many fighting for their life against the Wall of Corruption in the State of Montana.  Bill Windsor is of the light, a man of great Holiness sent to help us by the Great Spirit. A man of White Light, Healing, and a powerful spiritual warrior and messenger standing for us all and against the most extreme of odds.

Corruption and being powerless in corrupt courts though you have stacks of proof is something that take a huge toll on our soul, brings a great darkness and grief that can only be understood by those who have lived it. It is intensely spiritual to bring light to this people by creating a path for them to come out of the dark.  Bill Windsor has done this.

Bill Windsor's case makes a beautiful passage of light for all victims in the State of Montana to STAND Up, Fight Back, and perservere against extreme retaliation and corruption.

Victims of Domestic Violence, rape victims, victims of economic terrorism whereby if you don't do as the corrupt official say then you lose your job or way to make a money and are usually ran out of town, victims of all manner of crimes, civil rights and human rights violations who simply had no rights at all until the Internet and they could tell their story. However, the State of Montana found a way to actually DELETE the First Amendment rights, and they did this for years upon years with unethical, illegal and unconstitutional protective orders.

Take a Look at Bill Windsors recent update on all this and some back story.

Also Check out

http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/

http://www.LawlessAmerica.com/

http://ChrisShermer.blogspot.com/

http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/

The State of Montana Unethically, Unconstitutionally, and illegally uses PROTECTIVE orders to flat out STOP the flow of information, to STOP anti-corruption bloggers and to aid and abet corruption in Montana. The Bill Windsor Case is nationally highlighting what the State of Montana does to it's prey (those who dare to tell the Truth about Montana corruption).

The State of Montana is acting completely outside of law and the constitution of the United States of America and this is not the first time.

The State of Montana does this SAME THING, this same way to any blogger who dares to expose corruption in the State of Montana.

Blogging is a constitutionally protected activity, yet Montana courts uses unconstitutional protective orders to shut down blogs, stop tweet and STOP the flow of information online that reports on corruption in Government in the State of Montana.

The State of Montana all parties should be indicted and sued in civil court as well to expose this behavior and to STOP it from happening from this day forward as well as paying large amounts of money in judgments against them for who the State of Montana has selectively prosecuted and whose human rights they have violated in the past to protect corruption in the State of Montana and to protect the University of Montana.

"TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.

I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:

"The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.

"I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.

"Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.

"I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor.
According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.

"It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie.

Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.

"So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.

"The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.

"This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years.

If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."


Source

https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207968138827881

A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity YET the State of Montana uses Protective Orders to HARSHLY and Unconstitutionally shut down SPEECH that Speaks Critical of Montana Law Enforcement and the University of Montana, otherwise known as Whistle blower Retaliation and Selective Prosecution.

So there was a Made Up Tweet aKa Falsified Evidence, and there was no protective order and even if there was a protective ORDER,  it SIMPLY does not apply to a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity. WOW. 

I would say that the Missoula County Attorney's Office, Missoula County, the Missoula Police, Ravalli County, the Hamilton Police and the University of Montana will be paying 100's of Millions of Dollars to Michael Spreadbury, Crystal Cox and Bill Windsor. As You see the Montana Police went after Michael and Crystal with Protective Orders in hand, to STOP them from Blogging. Yet hmmm, it was clearly A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity, and they CLEARLY knew this.

These same Montana Agencies that have CLEARLY Falsified Evidence against Bill Windsor to suppress information, chill online speech and flat out STOP the flow of information; well they did the same thing to the blogs of Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury, of which Windsor was FACTUALLY reporting on.

Crystal Cox's blogs were flat out shut down by a Protective Order, the man that threatened to kill her got, (Sean Boushie in case you forgot). Ya my blogs were shut down and I was not allowed to speak or blog his name or the University of Montana for a year, or I WOULD GO TO JAIL.

These same group of Law Enforcement agencies and the University of Montana, used an Unconstitutional PROTECTIVE ORDER to Shut down my blogs.  Yet now we see the MT Supreme Court rule that NOT allowed, AS A MATTER OF LAW.

And this same group shut down Michael Spreadbury's constitutionally protected blogs and websites.

So Pattern and History? You Bet there is and LOT's of Evidence to that FACT.

 I, for one, can hardly wait for that RICO Lawsuit against ALL OF Ya'll. Coming Soon.

So now about this Blogging as "A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED Activity"?

Say What? Even in Montana? Ya don't say.

Well we already know that RIGHT? Yet here we have it CRIMINAL in Good Ol' Corrupt Missoula Montana, AGAIN? Not only should this case be CLEARLY dismissed but there should be an internal affairs investigation, a DOJ investigation, an FBI investigation and a Human Rights investigation into all of these agencies Immediately.  The EVIDENCE against them is mountainous and times 3, as they did this to all three of us and we all have lot's of proof. So ya, Criminal RICO and Civil RICO coming up, ASAP.

Not even a Civil Case, but CRIMINAL.

Doesn't Jennifer Clark of the Missoula County Attorney Office KNOW anything about the First Amendment? Has she researched the Boushie / Windsor history at all? Or any Montana Supreme Court cases, or say Ninth Circuit cases about BLOGGING?

Well look at this;

"The Montana Supreme Court previously ruled in Windsor v. Boushie that William M. Windsor’s blogging is not stalking and cannot be denied by any order of protection. Tweeting is a short form of blogging.

“…the offense of stalking does not apply to a constitutionally protected activity, § 45-5-220(2), MCA, and, as the District Court noted, the blogging alleged here involved First Amendment ‘free speech’ rights with which [Windsor and Boushie] each appear familiar and in which they regularly engage.” (Windsor v. Boushie, DA 13-0618 (Mont. 02/25/2014).)"


Source of above quote and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

Can you IMAGINE, you have to contact an attorney as a matter of law. A University of Montana attorney, and then you go to jail for alleged violations of a non-existence protective order?

"Bill Windsor has filed a motion to dismiss the criminal charge against him for an email to an attorney.

As far as William M. Windsor knows, he may be the only person ever criminally prosecuted for communication of a legal document to an attorney that was required by federal law.

Yes, it is totally ridiculous, but two years in the Montana State Prison is not funny..."

"This is the alleged crime, an email sent on February 6, 2014 that transmitted notice of filing an affidavit in a federal court case in which the attorney was shown as the agent for a party.

The short story to this is that an email was sent.  Emailing an attorney is certainly a Constitutionally-protected activity as well as a legal REQUIREMENT.  The bogus protective order issued against me on August 23, 2013 expired.  Even if it hadn't expired, it did not limit emailing legal documents to an attorney, and if it had, it would have been invalid as that would violate the Constitution and federal law.

The State of Montana has no evidence or testimony to prove that I personally sent the email, and their obligation is to prove that I sent it for the purpose of commiting a crime.  That's a joke."

"FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The charge reads: “On or about the 6th day of February, 2014, the above-named Defendant committed the offense of violation of an order of protection when, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violated a provision of an order provided for in 40-4-121 or an order of protection under Title 40, chapter 15, to wit: “Defendant emailed Claudia Denker-Eccles, Associate Counsel for the University of Montana, a third or subsequent offense.”

Exhibit 24 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of something that was sent on that date: Notice of Filing of Affidavit of Mary Wilson.  This is a legal document that William M. Windsor was required to send to Claudia Denker-Eccles by federal law.  

As she was the attorney-of-record for the University of Montana, a defendant in a case filed by William M. Windsor, she had to be sent this notice and affidavit.

Exhibit 25 in the folder on the Flash Drive named Missoula Montana Criminal Case filed with the Defendant’s Motion to Quash Bench Warrant is a true and correct copy of evidence that the University of Montana was a defendant, that she is the listed agent, and that she was served with the required legal service copy.

On August 17, 2015, each of the State’s witnesses were interviewed. The witness with knowledge of the email is Claudia Denker-Eccles, an attorney for the University of Montana. She testified that she received an email. She had no personal knowledge as to who sent the email other than the name Bill Windsor was on it. She did not report the email to anyone. She did nothing but advise her superior that she received an email. She never made a criminal complaint of any type. She was under the mistaken impression that the University of Montana had applied for and obtained a protective order."


Source and Full Article
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1760:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-an-email-to-an-attorney&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

The University of Montana is as Corrupt and Lawless as it Get's I Say.

The Missoula County Attorneys Office and Detective Chris Shermer of the Missoula Police either do NOT know Montana Law and the U.S constitution or they are PAID to cover up the INFAMOUS Corruption in the State of Montana.

"Montana law states very clearly (MCA 45-5-220) that stalking does not apply to Constitutionally-protected activity. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are the most fundamental of the Constitutionally-protected activities."

Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

So Why in the WORLD does the Missoula County Attorneys Office and Dipshit Detective Chris Shermer think that they can use an expired protective order or any protective order to go to another state on Montana Taxpayers dime, to retrieve and JAIL some guy talking on a blog?

Hmmm..

"William M. Windsor never sent a Tweet. 

The State has no evidence that he did. 

The State has no evidence or testimony to indicate that he knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order. Jennifer Clark swore to Judge Karen Townsend that William M. Windsor knowingly and purposely sent a Tweet to violate a protective order, but it was a false sworn pleading by Jennifer Clark."

Source and Lot's More
http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1759:bill-windsor-has-filed-a-motion-to-dismiss-the-criminal-charge-against-him-for-felony-tweeting&catid=160:charges&Itemid=236

For more Check Out
http://missoulacountyattorney.blogspot.com/

The University of Montana MUST be Held Accountable for their behavior and the actions of their law students.

"From: mspread@hotmail.com
To: jeff.renz@umontana.edu; jeffrenz@hotmail.com
CC: paul.kirgis@umontana.edu; elaine.gagliardi@umontana.edu; legaled@abanet.org; jareen@aals.org; rbunch@aals.org; prestalk@umontana.edu
Subject: student lawyers
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:46:57 -0600

Dear Legal Clinic Director Jeff Renz
University of Montana "Blewitt" Law School
Missoula, Montana

RE: Montana Law students caught prosecuting unsupervised summer 2015: Cascade County Montana

Dear Jeff,

When a Montana Law student prosecutes unsupervised in violation of the Montana Student Practice rule (unsupervised prior to JD or Bar passage) that is known as felony impersonation of a public official.

In 2012 the Chief Counsel for University of Montana David Aronofsky told me in a phone conversation that third year or 3L students continue to practice in this manner (unsupervised and in criminal act).  He left shortly thereafter.

As you may know, in 2007 I was also prosecuted by law student Angela Wetzsteon ('08) of your fine Blewitt law school on August 8, 2007 prior to completing her JD or Bar License on 10/9/2008 [available: www.angelawetzsteon.blogspot.com]

The Montana Student Practice Rule states that a supervisor is "personally and professionally liable" for the actions of the two (2) Montana law students committing felonies (also perjury due to false identity as "state prosecutor") in Cascade County Montana this summer.  How is your school going to discipline these students coming back this fall to the Blewitt law school, because committing felonies prior to finishing law school counts as blowing it in my book.(?)

I will leave you with my report from 2008 calling for your school accreditation bodies (American Association of Law Schools, (AALS); American Bar Association, (ABA)) to take disciplinary action.  Three hundred (300) people have read it online.

http://wethepeoplemt.blogspot.com/2012/12/american-bar-is-corrupt-says-spreadbury.html  

As I have mentioned unlawful student practice to the Montana Law school via former Dean Irma Russell, Ed Eck, The American Bar, the AALS  and taken the matter to appeal en banc with the 9th Circuit, this means that you, your Blewitt School, President Engstrom, and others are negligent because you knew or should have know that unlawful student practice would continue.  Actually Jeff, you are criminally negligent due to this involving the failure to supervise law students who are continuously committing felony crimes.  Crimes that are not victim-less.

For those reasons, I require your resignation for failure to stop criminal activity on UM Law's Blewitt campus.  These crimes will stop, and I am lawfully watching  how all parties involved are doing nothing but allowing the student unlawful practice (while unsupervised) to continue.

Let me know if you have any questions as to this criminal activity since approximately 1990 at your law school.

Michael Spreadbury"

The State of Montana ABUSES the power of the Protective Order to Chill Speech and COVER UP Corruption; Year after Year.

STOP the State of Montana from Using Protective orders against Anti-Corruption bloggers, online speakers, to chill speech, shut down blogs, stop the free flow of information, and retaliate against whistleblowers.

MONTANA ABUSE OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS
ABUSE OF DUE PROCESS

No matter how you look at it, it is unconstitutional to get a Protective Order to chill online speech in which is griping about you, reporting on you, making fun of you or simply posting your name. The State of Montana used this to silence my (Crystal Cox's) blogs, and to silence Montana anti-corruption blogger Michael Spreadbury and now Anti-Corruption Blogger and Film Producer, Lawless America Bill Windsor.

THERE IS NO FIRST AMENDMENT IN THE STATE OF MONTANA

In the EXTREME constitutional rights violating case of film producer, anti-corruption blogger Bill Windsor case we see severe Human Rights violations, Civil Rights Violations and flat out lies to jail this reporter and for allegedly tweeting the name of a man who allegedly tried to kill him and did threaten and harass him for years. We see a man jailed for a Protective Order that did not exist and the State of Montana protecting the University of Montana and a known stalker, and all to cover up corruption in the state of Montana.

It is NOT lawful to use a Protective Order to Chill Speech. 

It is our First Amendment right to Tweet, to blog, to report, to review, to gripe and it is not the State of Montana that has a right over our Free Speech to do so. Yet Montana uses Protective Orders for every dirty deed they want, as they can sneak in jurisdiction, they can put whatever terms they want to in the order, and they can shut up, shut down or suppress any blogger for any reason.

On the Matter of Montana having Super Powers of Jurisdiction over an alleged online Tweet allegedly from Texas by a South Dakota resident. How did this really happen?

If it were civil it would be  diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C.

Protective Orders have some super power, and the state of Montana abuses that power. The power that was meant to protect those really in danger, mostly woman from their ex-husbands and occasionally men and children from woman. It was not mean to SUPPRESS or CHILL speech or to violate our First Amendment Rights but that is exactly what the State of Montana unconstitutionally uses the law for.

I do not believe that Missoula MT has subject matter jurisdiction, or personal jurisdiction over Bill Windsor in this case. Windsor was never a Montana Resident and this alleged crime did not happen in Montana, not on Montana servers and not in the state of Montana.

"Once a court determines that it has subject matter jurisdiction, it must find at least one defendant over which it is “fair” (i.e., in accord with due process) to exercise personal jurisdiction."
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/legal-aspects-of-property-estate-planning-and-insurance/s06-02-the-problem-of-jurisdiction.html

Yes the above is Civil, however, keep in mind that Bill Windsor will have to file diversity in a Federal Court should he choose to sue all of these Montana agencies and individuals who have tortuously interfered with his business, violated his civil and constitutional rights, falsely imprisoned him and caused him immeasurable and irreparable harm.

Believe me, the sum will be well over $75,000 it will be millions upon millions.
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/28/IV/85/1332

Anyway, does Montana have jurisdiction over ALL of you out there tweeting? or reporting on Montana events, weather, politicians or even CORRUPTION?

Well they seem to think that if they don't like what you say, that they can get an UNCONSTITUTIONAL protective order granted to whomever you are reporting truthfully on, and then if you continue reporting, or exercising your First Amendment rights then they will come and get you in ANY state, drag you back to Montana and put you in THEIR JAIL and their Jurisdiction, completely against your will.  YEP TRUE STORY.

So if the ALLEGED Crime was committed Allegedly in Texas then doesn't Texas have Jurisdiction? And if so is this not a Federal case as the alleged victim is in Montana?

There was no actual injury or actual damages, and well there was no protective order and no tweet from the defendant and no crime, yet the State of Montana pursue's Bill Windsor.

For  your Study
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_jurisdiction


So did Montana use this:

"Full Faith and Credit Provisions

In addition to enforcing protective orders issued within a state, law enforcement agencies and state courts also must recognize orders issued in another state or jurisdiction.26 The full faith and credit provisions of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) require that every temporary or final injunction, protective order, or restraining order properly issued by a state court be given full faith and credit by courts in every other state"

How did Montana get Texas to arrest a man for posting online about Montana Corruption? How did Montana get Idaho to arrest that same man? I mean the Full Faith and Credit Provision is for battered spouses right? Not Tweeters.

In this Montana Case there was no CRIME, and there was false testimony regarding the existence of a possible crime. There was no protective order in place, yet Missoula County Montana jailed an innocent journalist, anti-corruption blogger for posting online about the University of Montana and Montana Corruption connected.

STAND UP TO THE STATE OF MONTANA 

We will not let one Corrupt State VIOLATE the Constitutional Rights of us all with BOGUS, unlawful, Speech Chilling ABUSE of protective orders.

The State of Montana uses Radical, Unconstitutional Methods

to SILENCE Bloggers (Journalists) who expose their way of life, their culture of corruption, 

their corrupt judges and attorneys, corrupt cops and detectives and attempt to 

expose what really goes on within the walls of the University of Montana.

The Bill Windsor case on Top of the VERY same action

that the State of Montana took against anti-corruption bloggers 

Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox is 

CLEAR PATTERN AND HISTORY.

All Montana Judges, Cops, Detectives, County Attorneys, Senators, 

Attorney Generals, Governors and all involved WILL be named

in a Criminal RICO Complaint.

The Conspiring and the Same Pattern and History to Cover up 

Corruption in Montana is now, more then ever, EASY to Prove.

For more on this Story Check out

http://missoulamontananews.blogspot.com/

And

http://hamiltonmontananews.blogspot.com/

And

http://montanacorruption.blogspot.com/

and

http://universityofmontanaemployee.com/

And

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/